Nov 022012
 

China’s security apparatus, and those of  many of its Asian neighbors, have been heavily criticized for their involvement in online censorship and surveillance and a failure to crack down on software and other intellectual piracy.

But their western counterparts may have managed to achieve a new low when it comes to abiding by and enforcing the rule of law over the internet, surveillance and intellectual property.  These actions would have been condemned by Western Nations if the case was in Asia and would probably have been attributed to corruption and other malfeasance.

But this controversy is being played out in a court case in New Zealand over the “megadownloads” website which is accused of being an internet piracy operation on a massive scale. The only certainty so fat is the arrogance and incompetence of  New Zealand and United States security agencies is being laid bare in an embarrassing and, for the case, catastrophic way.

The internal political fallout is also spectacular but more of a sideshow.

On trial is Kim Dotcom, originally from Germany but now a resident in New Zealand. He set up megadownloads and proceeded to make a fortune as people went to the site looking for free downloads of software, movies and other materials. Authorities contend it was  a fortune made on the back of stolen property.

The United States approached New Zealand’s Government Security Communications Bureau for assistance in gathering evidence with a view to extraditing him to America to stand trial.

From the beginning the investigation has been frightening in its utter and total incompetence. The GCSB is responsible for external intelligence issues, and I use the term “intelligence” purely in its technical sense. There are lot allowed by law to conduct surveillance on New Zealand residents.

They claimed they did not know Kim Dotcom was a resident. A quick check with the Department of Immigration could have answered that or if they were closed for the day perhaps Mr Dotcom’s  half million dollar fireworks display over Auckland, New Zealand’s largest city, to celebrate his attaining residency may have been a sufficient  hint.

It seems they never even did a google search on the man.

It is hard to imagine that even the intelligence agents’  primeval ancestors oozing from the oceans eons ago would not have seen the signs and  done some back ground checks before storming in with armed police to detain a man who does not look to be in the peak of physical condition that warranted such an operation.

This has now turned into a major political embarrassment and  looks as though it may destroy the case and raises questions about the US and NZ intelligence services.

The one good thing to come out of it is that we are being given a chance to see past the jingoistic rhetoric that surrounds online censorship, surveillance and the enforcement of the relevant aspects of the rule of law.

These wrongs are not nationalistic traits but traits of those who operate without supervision in the thirst for power and personal gain mixed in with a dash of incompetence and bigotry.

I am sure members of the New Zealand, American, British, Chinese, Russian security services among others have more in common with each other than they do with their fellow citizens.

The greatest danger to society is secrecy, censorship, lack of information and a closed and hidden Government. In this darkness festered the spores of Stalinism, Nazism and any other form of ism you care to mention that has reeked havoc on the world whether it came  from the left or the right of the political spectrum or from the devout to the atheist of personal faith.

I can only say that in my few dealings with members of intelligence agencies I have been left with less of a feeling that I have met a James Bond than having been lectured by some slightly precocious, overindulged 11-year-old who keeps insisting they are right but  cannot tell you why, topped off by what they assume is an enigmatic smile.

Then again perhaps that’s what they want us to believe.

 

 

 

Mar 052012
 

The appointment of Chinese Government censorship official Liu Binjie to the post of dean of journalism at one of the country’s top three universities raises further concerns over increasing government control of the media.

The China Media Project says that State media had reported  Liu Binjie (柳斌杰), the head of China’s General Administration of Press and Publications (GAPP) — the agency that licenses journalists and print publications in the country and oversees ideological training campaigns for media — will serve as dean of the Tsinghua School of Journalism and Communication effective March 1.

There is no doubt that Liu knows what a good story is, he must have blocked any number of them, but whether any insights from that privileged information will be passed on to his students is highly debatable. This is doubly so because it is not clear if he will be standing down from his current position or holding both concurrently.

It  likely is that this is a move to lesson the amount of work Liu’s  colleagues will have to do. If, before these embryonic journalists’ careers even begin, he can crush the independent, inquisitive and open nature that is at the heart of any good reporter, then the likelihood of the current students producing stories that would prove embarrassing or damaging to the current elite would be greatly lessened.

This whole thing smells of pre-emptive censorship.

Continue reading »

Nov 122010
 

In a legal milestone a New Zealand man has been jailed for four months after he accessed his former girlfriend’s Facebook account and changed settings to make public a nude picture of her.

The ruling walks a fine line between censorship and privacy but ultimately Judge Becroft said in making his decision he was adapting an old print law for the internet age.

“Technology can’t be used in this way,” he said. “You would do incalculable damage to someone’s reputation.”

The Judge also allowed the media to photograph the man, Joshua Simon Ashby, 20, saying there was a certain symmetry to him now having his identity made public. 

Ashby’s parents said they hoped the sentence would serve as warning to the dark side of social media websites.

The DominionPost newspaper reported Ashby as having  posted the photo in what the Judge described as an “irresponsible drunken jealous rage” after the breakup of his five-month relationship with the victim.

Continue reading »

Jul 132010
 

Over the last month a controversy has simmered in the small pacific nation of New Zealand following a state visit by China’s Vice President Xi Jinping in June.

And central to the issue is, at what point does a nation abandon its fundamental values for fear of upsetting a trading partner?

It started with a Tibetan flag. As the Chinese delegation arrived at Parliament they were greeted by Green Party MP Russell Norman,  holding up a Tibetan flag in silence.

Chinese security officials with entourage intervened and tore the flag away and assaulted him. The whole incident was caught on television.

YouTube Preview Image

New Zealand’s reaction to the incident has been mixed but New Zealand Prime Minister John Key was quick to apologize for Russell Norman’s actions not once but twice, once in New Zealand and last week on a visit to China according to TVNZ.

Key said: “I really don’t think that we should be inviting people to New Zealand at that level of seniority and then not showing them the respect that they can enter and exit a building.” Continue reading »